Skip to content
Thomson Reuters
Executive Perspectives

EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: Sustainable Financing, Carrot or Stick for the Corporate World?

In this recent article by HSBC, new research indicates that lack of corporate transparency on climate remains an impediment to informed decision-making by investors.  Subsequent to publication of this article, the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCDF) set out recommendations for helping businesses disclose climate-related financial risks and opportunities.

Improving transparency is a critical component of measuring and managing progress on climate specifically, and on sustainable development generally, and this piece provides a current and valuable context for the issues.


Getting everyone on the same page through corporate disclosure

According to recent research, commissioned by HSBC and conducted by East & Partners, nearly 85 per cent of institutional investors who were contacted believe that current levels of corporate disclosure around climate related risks faced by a business are inadequate, with
over half of European and American investors finding the level of current disclosure as highly inadequate. To date, corporate disclosure has been voluntary with little to no consequences for those who did not comply either in
full or in part. With less than a quarter (23.8 per cent) of corporate issuers contacted disclosing their environmental impact and a limited 37 per cent disclosing their green strategy initiatives, it is not difficult to grasp the magnitude of the task ahead for the Financial Stability Boards Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD).

While green bonds are a vital piece of the sustainability agenda, corporate disclosure around use of natural resources and CO2 emissions remain a key factor 
in establishing a global green financial system. The lack of a standardized reporting structure hinders the ability of investors to assess potential risks faced
 by companies such as exposure to stranded assets, disruptions in supply chains and damage to infrastructure, all of which weigh on institutional investors.

While the levels of climate related disclosure are increasing, with the research showing a rise of 23.7 
per cent of corporate issuers planning to disclose their environmental impact over the coming year, there
 is a lack of consistency in the scope and quality of information being disclosed. Consistent, reliable data 
is needed to enable comparisons across companies, markets and regions, to compare performance and implement financial policies. Recommendations from the TCFD are due in December and should provide clear guidelines on the route to increased transparency, which should support efforts by the financial community to mainstream environmental, social and governance (ESG) investments and move the focus of the sustainability agenda from education to one of active management.

For the complete article, please link here.

EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: More restaurants are weighing the food they throw away and this is why you should care EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: “Epic” storms are part of a larger global pattern of disruption/change EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: Billion-dollar missed opportunity from under-reporting on environment EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: It Takes One EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: Entering uncharted waters – ocean conservation key to the future EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: Values and impact are increasingly relevant to investors EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: Poor sustainability standards in livestock risk health and wealth of all of us EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: The Secret Life of Green Finance EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: Restoring education to Brazil’s lost generation: Q&A with Tamboro EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE: A government solution for the people, by the people: Q&A with Colab